ADVERTISEMENT

..and in other news

I think he’s brainstorming how to help the area get back to normal in a better way. Do I think it’s a good idea or not? I would say no, but I don’t know the details. Unless I missed it, the war activities between Israel and Hamxs would have to be finished before the US would get involved. Isn’t stopping the fighting what the people want? Why are we jumping at every little thing Trump says? That’s what people like Glen want. They hate Trump so badly, they have to be right and they couldn’t wait 2 weeks before trying to post gotchas. What wars did Trump get the US involved in last time? All Presidents prior to Trump were afraid of moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem fearing it would set off WW3. When Trump moved it, well, we’re still here. The negotiations in the mid-east done by the SIL Kirschner in 45 admin was nothing short of very good.
That's fair. My intent in the post you quoted wasn't to be critical of (nor laud) the statements. Like you said, we really don't know what this is going to look like. Just spitballing:

Reasons to get directly involved in some way might be that there's a long standing human tragedy going on there and ending it would be objectively good (and iirc part of the agenda discussed in the campaign), and peace in the Middle East is in our long-term best interests. Another is to ensure whatever aid does get sent there is actually deployed to the benefit of the people there and isn't skimmed off by Hamas or other bad actors. Reasons not to get involved are mainly that interventions are a tricky thing and similar activities in the region have been very expensive in terms of blood and treasure and generally have not achieved the goals stated publicly to the American people.

If the administration is going to make our direct involvement conditional on hostilities terminating, it's still tricky, but decidedly preferable to going over there to win a war first, then rebuild something. We'll just have to see how it plays out. If both sides are agreeable to a postwar US presence it could easily be a good thing. If we just become a target of terrorism, not so good.

I don't know if it as a conscious strategy, but the administration is moving aggressively on many fronts which makes it difficult for the bureaucratic deep state/uniparty/(D)s to marshal their forces to defy POTUS and the administration.
 
Last edited:
I don’t care about their religion. They shouldn’t be moved and certainly US troops shouldn’t be involved.
I don’t think Trump’s point is about troops. What he’s saying is rebuilding Gaza by throwing money into the place is a losing game. For each new building, we’ll get 10 new rockets made and ready to be fired at Israel whenever the next conflict erupts. Instead, the reconstruction will have to be done by trusted outside parties so the people get what they need and not what terrorists want.

edit: And the UN has proven they’re not a trusted outside party.
 
I don’t think Trump’s point is about troops. What he’s saying is rebuilding Gaza by throwing money into the place is a losing game. For each new building, we’ll get 10 new rockets made and ready to be fired at Israel whenever the next conflict erupts. Instead, the reconstruction will have to be done by trusted outside parties so the people get what they need and not what terrorists want.
I’ll wait to make a judgment but if you think the Israelis don’t have an eye on that land….
 
I’ll wait to make a judgment but if you think the Israelis don’t have an eye on that land….
When talking about American politics, there's no such thing as "Americans" and this thread is just one of a millions examples of that. Same thing in Israel. In well over 50 years, they've yet to figure out what to do with the West Bank. Some want to annex it, some want to spin it as a separate country (those are about the two most polar options imaginable) and some want to leave it as a "territory". Some want more land for Jews while others can't stand the thought of having another 3 million Arab citizens of Israel (Israel is about 20% Arab now).

So, yes, some have their eye on Gaza but that's likely a minority position. Our friend who lives in Israel I'm sure would say it's a minority view based on everything else she's said on what's going on now.
 
Get real. Trump is trying to draw moderate Arab countries into being part of the solution.
LOL they all are outraged by his plan, will not take Palestinians, Saudi Arabia will not do anything without assurance of a Palestinian state, Al Quida started because of U.S. troops stationed in Saudi Arabia, this will create a couple of million more terrorists. Unhinged!!!
 
When talking about American politics, there's no such thing as "Americans" and this thread is just one of a millions examples of that. Same thing in Israel. In well over 50 years, they've yet to figure out what to do with the West Bank. Some want to annex it, some want to spin it as a separate country (those are about the two most polar options imaginable) and some want to leave it as a "territory". Some want more land for Jews while others can't stand the thought of having another 3 million Arab citizens of Israel (Israel is about 20% Arab now).

So, yes, some have their eye on Gaza but that's likely a minority position. Our friend who lives in Israel I'm sure would say it's a minority view based on everything else she's said on what's going on now.
This is a fair position but my point is those Gazans don’t want to leave Gaza. No one should force them to leave
 
LOL they all are outraged by his plan, will not take Palestinians, Saudi Arabia will not do anything without assurance of a Palestinian state, Al Quida started because of U.S. troops stationed in Saudi Arabia, this will create a couple of million more terrorists. Unhinged!!!
US policy has created terrorists in other parts. The US just toppled Assad and basically let radicals walk into Syria (and remember that Israel just claimed parts of Syria).
 
When talking about American politics, there's no such thing as "Americans" and this thread is just one of a millions examples of that. Same thing in Israel. In well over 50 years, they've yet to figure out what to do with the West Bank. Some want to annex it, some want to spin it as a separate country (those are about the two most polar options imaginable) and some want to leave it as a "territory". Some want more land for Jews while others can't stand the thought of having another 3 million Arab citizens of Israel (Israel is about 20% Arab now).

So, yes, some have their eye on Gaza but that's likely a minority position. Our friend who lives in Israel I'm sure would say it's a minority view based on everything else she's said on what's going on now.
Pay attention to who wrote this article.
 
I don’t think Trump’s point is about troops. What he’s saying is rebuilding Gaza by throwing money into the place is a losing game. For each new building, we’ll get 10 new rockets made and ready to be fired at Israel whenever the next conflict erupts. Instead, the reconstruction will have to be done by trusted outside parties so the people get what they need and not what terrorists want.

edit: And the UN has proven they’re not a trusted outside party.
The mental gymnastics are astounding.

If the US occupies Gaza, there will be US troops in Gaza. Is that what you voted for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: flight 33
Trump is playing chess while some are still trying to figure out the color of their marbles.

Everything Trump says about the Middle East is designed to get people off their squares. We all know that region has been stuck in a disastrous status quo for decades. He wants the regional players to step up to the problem instead of staying in their bunkers and saying the UN can take care of it... just throw them some more money. The UN is the absolute worst option and Trump knows that. Saying US troops are a possible option is all about getting people in the region to do something different.
 
That's fair. My intent in the post you quoted wasn't to be critical of (nor laud) the statements. Like you said, we really don't know what this is going to look like. Just spitballing:

Reasons to get directly involved in some way might be that there's a long standing human tragedy going on there and ending it would be objectively good (and iirc part of the agenda discussed in the campaign), and peace in the Middle East is in our long-term best interests. Another is to ensure whatever aid does get sent there is actually deployed to the benefit of the people there and isn't skimmed off by Hamas or other bad actors. Reasons not to get involved are mainly that interventions are a tricky thing and similar activities in the region have been very expensive in terms of blood and treasure and generally have not achieved the goals stated publicly to the American people.

If the administration is going to make our direct involvement conditional on hostilities terminating, it's still tricky, but decidedly preferable to going over there to win a war first, then rebuild something. We'll just have to see how it plays out. If both sides are agreeable to a postwar US presence it could easily be a good thing. If we just become a target of terrorism, not so good.

I don't know if it as a conscious strategy, but the administration is moving aggressively on many fronts which makes it difficult for the bureaucratic deep state/uniparty/(D)s to marshal their forces to defy POTUS and the administration.
Could the end results be another Marshall Plan that rebuilt Europe, the parts not behind the Iron Curtain !
 
Could the end results be another Marshall Plan that rebuilt Europe, the parts not behind the Iron Curtain !
I don't see why not, and tbh so far that's the sense I've gotten of what the administration intends as an approach, but it's still very early on and not much in the way of specifics has been articulated yet as far as I know. One thing we can count on now is that we have a POTUS who won't hide from questions. He also did a very good job this time surrounding himself with people who can articulate the administration's policies and actions. I'm guessing this one will fall under Rubio more than Hegseth.
 
Trump is playing chess while some are still trying to figure out the color of their marbles.

Everything Trump says about the Middle East is designed to get people off their squares. We all know that region has been stuck in a disastrous status quo for decades. He wants the regional players to step up to the problem instead of staying in their bunkers and saying the UN can take care of it... just throw them some more money. The UN is the absolute worst option and Trump knows that. Saying US troops are a possible option is all about getting people in the region to do something different.
More gymnastics.

Boy we’ve gone from America First and bring our troops home to let’s orchestrate policing and rebuilding the Middle East in just over two weeks.

I’ll ask again. Did you vote for US troops in Gaza?
 
More gymnastics.

Boy we’ve gone from America First and bring our troops home to let’s orchestrate policing and rebuilding the Middle East in just over two weeks.

I’ll ask again. Did you vote for US troops in Gaza?
It’s all bizarre. Maybe and hopefully just lip service from Trump after Netanyahu visit. Trump hates Netanyahu btw
 
More gymnastics.

Boy we’ve gone from America First and bring our troops home to let’s orchestrate policing and rebuilding the Middle East in just over two weeks.

I’ll ask again. Did you vote for US troops in Gaza?
There won't be US troops in Gaza just like there isn't a huge tariff on Quebec maple syrup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ILisBest
It’s all bizarre. Maybe and hopefully just lip service from Trump after Netanyahu visit. Trump hates Netanyahu btw
It’s fascinating watching folks rationalize completely leveling a territory and relocating over a million civilians from their home so the US can occupy and rebuild the land.

I hope it was just bluster, but Israel owns Trump so not likely.
 
It’s fascinating watching folks rationalize completely leveling a territory and relocating over a million civilians from their home so the US can occupy and rebuild the land.

I hope it was just bluster, but Israel owns Trump so not likely.
Many Americans are starting to notice this…I still haven’t gotten over Netanyahu goading us into war in the Middle East 30 years ago
 
Oil futures DOWN 1 - 2 % this morning.

ICE arrests most illegals in one day ! Just under 1,000 !
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT