ADVERTISEMENT

Current events

I listened to a longer version. There is no justification for what he said. Keep defending the orange clown.
 
Head deep in the sand of Waikiki Jeff says the economy is good and that Trump can’t improve it.

Get a grip with reality Jeff because the reality is the US is losing jobs since this will be revised downward after the election.

 
  • Like
Reactions: ILisBest
Actually, if you dislike what he said, you might be the one with issues. He was very specifically pointing out the issues of Liz liking wars, being a chicken hawk neocon just like her dad. She has no appreciation for staring down the barrel of an enemy.
Does Trump? Mr. Deferment.

I understand the point he was making. He could have made it without the violence. Keep defending the orange goof.
 
I am not a fan at all of using lawfare as an election tactic, no matter which direction it goes. But I do think there are some things that need to be subject to a very bright light, and the potential "contribution in kind" issues from entities that would claim freedom-of-the-press privileges as supposed journalism outlets while exhibiting extreme and often dishonest bias is one of them. I just wish the suit was brought by someone other than a candidate prior to the relevant election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncoach
There was a great deal of noise in the October numbers including hurricanes and the Boeing strike. Makes it more difficult to determine the direction of the economy. Markets are taking the number in stride.

Remember Trump did not want any rate cuts this year because it would help the economy and hurt his chances. What a tool.
 
Head deep in the sand of Waikiki Jeff says the economy is good and that Trump can’t improve it.

Get a grip with reality Jeff because the reality is the US is losing jobs since this will be revised downward after the election.

Ever hear of hurricanes and the Boeing strike? Markets are taking the numbers in stride. I guess you know more.
 
As we enter the final days of the election one thing I try to keep in mind is the next 4 years will be heavily influenced by who controls the Senate and House. Biden has expanded executive orders to a historic level, including unilateral handouts for college loans. But the Senate and House can still block or enable a lot of a president's agenda and the next 4 years will be no different.

I tried to find something this morning predicting who will get control but the closest was a prediction that the Repubs probably will get control of the Senate. The House appears like there are 23 races rated as tossup that will decide it. Lots of razor thin races at the moment.

Whomever wins the WH will inherit a mess. Biden has been the worst president in history so if it is Kamala, I don't have much hope for improvement. Trump will be better, but bozo the clown would be better. If he is elected I hope he gets a majority in both chambers so he can implement something like a border wall. Seems so simple.
 
and the potential "contribution in kind" issues from entities that would claim freedom-of-the-press privileges as supposed journalism outlets while exhibiting extreme and often dishonest bias is one of them.
If that was a basis for suit, FOX would end up paying another near $Billion for being the Trump propaganda outlet.
 
Trump voters say the are voting on policy and ignoring character. Apparently, Trump has neither policy nor character.
It is hard to wrap your head around Trump using the threat of tariff's to negotiate. He has plenty of policy out there for you to read up on.

I guess it is good character to leave the border open for all the problems and expenses that come with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncoach
There was a great deal of noise in the October numbers including hurricanes and the Boeing strike. Makes it more difficult to determine the direction of the economy. Markets are taking the number in stride.

Remember Trump did not want any rate cuts this year because it would help the economy and hurt his chances. What a tool.
Amazing the excuses out of the Harris supporters. I would be a little embarrassed also, I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncoach
Trump voters say the are voting on policy and ignoring character. Apparently, Trump has neither policy nor character.
Trump is the one who's at least floating ideas instead of just reguritating "I was raised in a middle class family" while wearing that $60K+ necklace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncoach
Trump will destroy the economy with his moronic tariff plan.
As a fellow billionaire to Trump said, tariffs are a negotiating tactic. Your neocons have been supportive of the destruction of a strong US economy for at least 40 years. Just show me the money doesn't cut it. Our national security interests were hijacked by diehard free trade, too.
 
It is hard to wrap your head around Trump using the threat of tariff's to negotiate. He has plenty of policy out there for you to read up on.

I guess it is good character to leave the border open for all the problems and expenses that come with that.
It's immoral to lock up black men for marijuana violations as a prosecutor while admittedly taking tokes herself at the time.
 
Voters on both sides seem to demand that every candidate for federal office have a plan to fix every problem in America with a massively expensive, centralized plan.
 
I have read it and disagree with about 75% of it. A great deal of it is short on specifics and represents objectives instead of actual policy
You said he had no policy. He very clearly has policy. Just because you disagree with about 75% of it, it doesn’t mean he doesn’t have policies. Tell us what Kackles is going to do.
 
Right now the country spends something like $4.3T/year managing chronic metabolic diseases (obesity, type-2 diabetes, arterial disease, cardiac disease, stroke, dementia, liver disease, obesity, many cancers). I don't know what fraction of that bill is paid by federal taxpayers, but it's probably "real money". On top of that, there's quite a lot of associated suffering and decreased productivity. These conditions are increasingly appearing in children in this country. Any set of healthcare proposals by a political candidate that does not seek to meaningfully go after the root causes of that epidemic/disaster can't really be considered serious IMO.
 
You said he had no policy. He very clearly has policy. Just because you disagree with about 75% of it, it doesn’t mean he doesn’t have policies. Tell us what Kackles is going to do.

Trump is not a policy guy. He flip flops constantly.
Trump saying he wants better health care is not a policy.

I suppose in the end it does not matter too much to me.
If Trump wins and the Republican party stays MAGA, I will
become a Democrat lean instead of a Republican lean and
will likely vote Democrat most of the time. I guess I will be shifting
with the demographic shifts between the parties.
 
Last edited:
I have read it and disagree with about 75% of it. A great deal of it is short on specifics and represents objectives instead of actual policy
You can agree with 25% of what Trump has come out with and it’s still more than all of what Harris has said of substance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AzIllini
Biden called Trump supporters garbage. Period. You can’t spin that.

It’s unlikely to hurt Harris. She didn’t say it.

The highest reputation Democratic pollster and guru in DC ( Kuntz ((sp ?))) was quoted yesterday: " That this sinks Camella's chances !"
 
It would appear that the voter database needs to be updated for new addresses. How are these mistakes going to result in significant fraud. Most people would either have the ballots returned to sender or would throw them away.
A friend of ours requested a mail-in ballot from his town in New York State.

He received the ballot in his mail. He held the ballot for a few days, as he went on a short vacation.
When he was home, he got a phone call asking why he had not returned the ballot. (He didn't recall who called, Dem/Rep or town ?).

The person asked was there any help he needed to fill out the ballot ? Anything the person could do to help him properly mark the ballot ?

He mailed it in !
 
The question is about election integrity. And if these really were just innocent mistakes, which is a big assumption on its own, then doesn't it cast doubt on election integrity regardless of whether it was the result of fraud? Besides, how would an innocent mistake like this have been made in the first place?
Ask Walter Mondale or Swillery !
 
Cheney campaigning for Harris and speaking of the danger of Trump gives permission to mainstream Republicans that do not care for MAGA and dislike Trump to vote for Harris rather than being obligated to vote for a dangerous fool just because he has an R after his name on the ballot. You guys are Trump loving MAGA so you don't realize the formerly traditional Republicans that cannot bring themselves to vote for him due to his anti-democratic tendencies.
He's so "dangerous" to end nondeclared wars and illegal immigration. Oh I'm so scared ! I'm going to fill up my gas tank before he raises gas to OVER $ 4.00 like early in Biden economics !
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT