ADVERTISEMENT

Bryant, Scott named AP All-Big Ten First Team

AP Release

Pat Bryant – AP All-Big Ten First Team

Bryant ranked second in the Big Ten in receiving yards (984) and tied for first in receiving touchdowns (10) during the regular season. He led the nation with three game-winning touchdown catches in the final minute/overtime this season.

Xavier Scott – AP All-Big Ten First Team

Illinois' defense was led by AP All-Big Ten First Team honoree Xavier Scott, who joined Devon Witherspoon (2022), Sydney Brown (2022), and Kerby Joseph (2021) as All-Big Ten First Team defense backs during Bret Bielema's tenure. Scott tied for second in the Big Ten in interceptions (4) and was named one of 15 semifinalists for the Paycom Jim Thorpe Award, given to the nation’s best defensive back.

..and in other news

You might be right to rip off the band-aid and do one blanket pardon to be done and move on. Although the panel suggested would cushion the blow with a semblance of fairness, the left will have more time to overanalyze and vilify. I am guessing Trump does it the way you suggested. He appears to be less tolerant of leftwing critics than before and definitely will not be worried about the optics for reelection.

I think Train just despises Trump. I am not so sure he will disagree so much with how he governs. He definitely believed Trump would lead the GOP into massive election losses. Now that it didn't play out that way, I am guessing he will be more reasonable than the others you mentioned.
Oh Train will be far more reasonable than the others for sure. Funny thing is he got it exactly wrong - Trump saved the GOP from massive election losses. Trump was able to win the PA Senate Seat among others. Rs nationwide trailed Trump.

I'd like a mix of majority pardons and some commutations for the real offenders. I've been very dismissive of J6, but I'd like to know who the 'worst' offender was among the protestors. You can't violate Pelosi's office for sure. But, the Capitol Police 'defense' of that building appears to me to be criminal. They just stood around watching or in a rare case murdered a prostate woman. Definitely not a proud day from any perspective - it is time to expose the Deep State side of that day.
  • Like
Reactions: bung23 and ILisBest

..and in other news

I'm all for the pretty much blanket pardons for 1/6 on 1/20 at 1201 EST. For those who actually committed violence - no. But, who did actually commit violence? Not many with the exception of the Capitol Police who literally got away with murder.

The American people don't care about January 6 as evidenced by the last election and the Democrats constant whining about "Democracy is on the ballot". Only dupes like Train, Jeff, and Icky were deeply troubled by that day as evidenced by the FACT that Trump was favored on the issue of "Democracy" in this here Republic. And FWIW, the FBI and deep state involvement will come out. They had a large number of embedded operatives including poor old Ray Epps.

Lastly, these pardons will be absolutely buried by the constant whining of the Democrats as Trump goes all in on issue after issue. You name it, it will upset Train, Icky, and Jeff - end of aid to Ukraine, Deportation, Israel/Hostages, Deportation (I like Deportation), Keystone piping, firing of Federal Attorneys, executive orders, and so forth. It's going to be a whirlwind and this is not something Trump will want to drag out with a 3 judge panel - not that a 3 judge panel is a bad idea.

And I'm for investigating and prosecuting the J6 committee for destruction of records. After all, "Records" are very important to Stone, Icky, Train, and Jeff. They approved the raid on Mar-a-lago and condoned Senator / VP Biden having top secret documents in his garage. Too bad he was ruled too incompetent to be charged - that is Jeff's guy!
You might be right to rip off the band-aid and do one blanket pardon to be done and move on. Although the panel suggested would cushion the blow with a semblance of fairness, the left will have more time to overanalyze and vilify. I am guessing Trump does it the way you suggested. He appears to be less tolerant of leftwing critics than before and definitely will not be worried about the optics for reelection.

I think Train just despises Trump. I am not so sure he will disagree so much with how he governs. He definitely believed Trump would lead the GOP into massive election losses. Now that it didn't play out that way, I am guessing he will be more reasonable than the others you mentioned.
  • Like
Reactions: Uncoach

..and in other news

A fair opinion.


The proposed pardons for the rioters who invaded the U.S. Capitol almost five years ago (can you believe it) can work both for and against President Trump, depending on how he handles the complex situation.

The fact that all of those prosecuted were ardent Trump supporters brings an emotional component to Mr. Trump's decision. It's tough to let the legal bus rollover folks who love you.

But justice is also in play here. The country simply cannot allow political violence. Most intelligent folks understand that. Therefore, no blanket presidential pardon should be issued.

Here's the fair way to decide the fates of more than 1,500 individuals charged in the situation. Have the Attorney General set up a panel of three well-respected judges to review each case separately and make recommendations. Then, follow the consensus of the judges unless extraordinary circumstances are present.

That would take politics out of it and put precise reasoning into it. Who could object to that?

The testimony is already on the record, so the process should move quickly. President Trump, of course, has the power to override decisions, but this gives him an opportunity to examine each case in a fair way.
I'm all for the pretty much blanket pardons for 1/6 on 1/20 at 1201 EST. For those who actually committed violence - no. But, who did actually commit violence? Not many with the exception of the Capitol Police who literally got away with murder.

The American people don't care about January 6 as evidenced by the last election and the Democrats constant whining about "Democracy is on the ballot". Only dupes like Train, Jeff, and Icky were deeply troubled by that day as evidenced by the FACT that Trump was favored on the issue of "Democracy" in this here Republic. And FWIW, the FBI and deep state involvement will come out. They had a large number of embedded operatives including poor old Ray Epps.

Lastly, these pardons will be absolutely buried by the constant whining of the Democrats as Trump goes all in on issue after issue. You name it, it will upset Train, Icky, and Jeff - end of aid to Ukraine, Deportation, Israel/Hostages, Deportation (I like Deportation), Keystone piping, firing of Federal Attorneys, executive orders, and so forth. It's going to be a whirlwind and this is not something Trump will want to drag out with a 3 judge panel - not that a 3 judge panel is a bad idea.

And I'm for investigating and prosecuting the J6 committee for destruction of records. After all, "Records" are very important to Stone, Icky, Train, and Jeff. They approved the raid on Mar-a-lago and condoned Senator / VP Biden having top secret documents in his garage. Too bad he was ruled too incompetent to be charged - that is Jeff's guy!

..and in other news

A fair opinion.


The proposed pardons for the rioters who invaded the U.S. Capitol almost five years ago (can you believe it) can work both for and against President Trump, depending on how he handles the complex situation.

The fact that all of those prosecuted were ardent Trump supporters brings an emotional component to Mr. Trump's decision. It's tough to let the legal bus rollover folks who love you.

But justice is also in play here. The country simply cannot allow political violence. Most intelligent folks understand that. Therefore, no blanket presidential pardon should be issued.

Here's the fair way to decide the fates of more than 1,500 individuals charged in the situation. Have the Attorney General set up a panel of three well-respected judges to review each case separately and make recommendations. Then, follow the consensus of the judges unless extraordinary circumstances are present.

That would take politics out of it and put precise reasoning into it. Who could object to that?

The testimony is already on the record, so the process should move quickly. President Trump, of course, has the power to override decisions, but this gives him an opportunity to examine each case in a fair way.
  • Like
Reactions: Uncoach
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT