stoneaxe27 said:

There was a fair way to decide their fates, it was used to convict or acquit them in the first place. The U.S. Justice system was used, it the best in the world. Why in the Hell would you think that having a political hack like Pam Bondi appoint set up a panel would be less political then the U.S. court system?

Click to expand...

stoneaxe27 said:

There was a fair way to decide their fates, it was used to convict or acquit them in the first place. The U.S. Justice system was used, it the best in the world. Why in the Hell would you think that having a political hack like Pam Bondi appoint set up a panel would be less political then the U.S. court system?

Click to expand...

tjfleck6 said:

I mean this new spot - the highest point in Syria apparently - will be controlled by the Israelis long after you and I are dead IMO.

Click to expand...

OhioIllini said:

What they annexed was more than 40 years ago. Did you mean temporary occupation? Syria and Israel have technically been at war for over 50 years.

Click to expand...

ILisBest said:

Here's the fair way to decide the fates of more than 1,500 individuals charged in the situation. Have the Attorney General set up a panel of three well-respected judges to review each case separately and make recommendations. Then, follow the consensus of the judges unless extraordinary circumstances are present.

That would take politics out of it and put precise reasoning into it. Who could object to that?

Click to expand...

tjfleck6 said:

Temporary annexation will likely outlive all of us. Just sayin’

Click to expand...

OhioIllini said:

The official position from Israel appears to be a temporary military presence in the DMZ until the political situation in Syria is sorted out. Sure, some right wing media person might talk about additional annexation but doesn't mean much... I don't think.

Click to expand...