This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

The problem with regime change in places like Syria is the new regime is no better and sometimes worse.
My goodness

Login to view embedded media

flight 33 said:

So they are expanding and annexing more land? I really don’t care. Leave us out of it and stop making us fund it …
Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

The official position from Israel appears to be a temporary military presence in the DMZ until the political situation in Syria is sorted out. Sure, some right wing media person might talk about additional annexation but doesn't mean much... I don't think.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

OhioIllini said:

WikiLeaks has that all wrong. Israel annexed their "side" of the Golan Heights in 1981. Netanyahu is refering to the current importance of that action 40+ years ago. What they did this week is occupy the small DMZ adjacent to what they annexed in 1981.

Click to expand...

So they are expanding and annexing more land? I really don’t care. Leave us out of it and stop making us fund it …
Login to view embedded media

flight 33 said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

WikiLeaks has that all wrong. Israel annexed their "side" of the Golan Heights in 1981. Netanyahu is refering to the current importance of that action 40+ years ago. What they did this week is occupy the small DMZ adjacent to what they annexed in 1981.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

ILisBest said:

You might be right to rip off the band-aid and do one blanket pardon to be done and move on. Although the panel suggested would cushion the blow with a semblance of fairness, the left will have more time to overanalyze and vilify. I am guessing Trump does it the way you suggested. He appears to be less tolerant of leftwing critics than before and definitely will not be worried about the optics for reelection.

I think Train just despises Trump. I am not so sure he will disagree so much with how he governs. He definitely believed Trump would lead the GOP into massive election losses. Now that it didn't play out that way, I am guessing he will be more reasonable than the others you mentioned.

Click to expand...

Oh Train will be far more reasonable than the others for sure. Funny thing is he got it exactly wrong - Trump saved the GOP from massive election losses. Trump was able to win the PA Senate Seat among others. Rs nationwide trailed Trump.

I'd like a mix of majority pardons and some commutations for the real offenders. I've been very dismissive of J6, but I'd like to know who the 'worst' offender was among the protestors. You can't violate Pelosi's office for sure. But, the Capitol Police 'defense' of that building appears to me to be criminal. They just stood around watching or in a rare case murdered a prostate woman. Definitely not a proud day from any perspective - it is time to expose the Deep State side of that day.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.