ADVERTISEMENT

..and in other news

A fair opinion.


The proposed pardons for the rioters who invaded the U.S. Capitol almost five years ago (can you believe it) can work both for and against President Trump, depending on how he handles the complex situation.

The fact that all of those prosecuted were ardent Trump supporters brings an emotional component to Mr. Trump's decision. It's tough to let the legal bus rollover folks who love you.

But justice is also in play here. The country simply cannot allow political violence. Most intelligent folks understand that. Therefore, no blanket presidential pardon should be issued.

Here's the fair way to decide the fates of more than 1,500 individuals charged in the situation. Have the Attorney General set up a panel of three well-respected judges to review each case separately and make recommendations. Then, follow the consensus of the judges unless extraordinary circumstances are present.

That would take politics out of it and put precise reasoning into it. Who could object to that?

The testimony is already on the record, so the process should move quickly. President Trump, of course, has the power to override decisions, but this gives him an opportunity to examine each case in a fair way.
I'm all for the pretty much blanket pardons for 1/6 on 1/20 at 1201 EST. For those who actually committed violence - no. But, who did actually commit violence? Not many with the exception of the Capitol Police who literally got away with murder.

The American people don't care about January 6 as evidenced by the last election and the Democrats constant whining about "Democracy is on the ballot". Only dupes like Train, Jeff, and Icky were deeply troubled by that day as evidenced by the FACT that Trump was favored on the issue of "Democracy" in this here Republic. And FWIW, the FBI and deep state involvement will come out. They had a large number of embedded operatives including poor old Ray Epps.

Lastly, these pardons will be absolutely buried by the constant whining of the Democrats as Trump goes all in on issue after issue. You name it, it will upset Train, Icky, and Jeff - end of aid to Ukraine, Deportation, Israel/Hostages, Deportation (I like Deportation), Keystone piping, firing of Federal Attorneys, executive orders, and so forth. It's going to be a whirlwind and this is not something Trump will want to drag out with a 3 judge panel - not that a 3 judge panel is a bad idea.

And I'm for investigating and prosecuting the J6 committee for destruction of records. After all, "Records" are very important to Stone, Icky, Train, and Jeff. They approved the raid on Mar-a-lago and condoned Senator / VP Biden having top secret documents in his garage. Too bad he was ruled too incompetent to be charged - that is Jeff's guy!

..and in other news

A fair opinion.


The proposed pardons for the rioters who invaded the U.S. Capitol almost five years ago (can you believe it) can work both for and against President Trump, depending on how he handles the complex situation.

The fact that all of those prosecuted were ardent Trump supporters brings an emotional component to Mr. Trump's decision. It's tough to let the legal bus rollover folks who love you.

But justice is also in play here. The country simply cannot allow political violence. Most intelligent folks understand that. Therefore, no blanket presidential pardon should be issued.

Here's the fair way to decide the fates of more than 1,500 individuals charged in the situation. Have the Attorney General set up a panel of three well-respected judges to review each case separately and make recommendations. Then, follow the consensus of the judges unless extraordinary circumstances are present.

That would take politics out of it and put precise reasoning into it. Who could object to that?

The testimony is already on the record, so the process should move quickly. President Trump, of course, has the power to override decisions, but this gives him an opportunity to examine each case in a fair way.
  • Like
Reactions: Uncoach

..and in other news

Isn’t this the kind of thing RFK Jr is talking about with our food industry?

Login to view embedded media
I can't speak to this particular instance (but unless I find convincing proof the claim is false, I'll never touch Starbucks again, lol), but regarding coffee, I believe most of the coffee sold in the US could not be sold in most of the rest of the world because the level of mold is too high.

The thing is, there are dozens if not hundreds of situations like this, along with libraries of corrupted "science" to justify them. Even a cursory glance at any sort of US epidemiological data shows a massive problem, the cost of which is something north of $4.2T annually in the US. Kennedy was involved in successfully litigating a number of such cases as pertains to children's health. He may not have a shiny certificate from the National Association of Democratic Party Health and Human Service Professionals, but he has the discernment to pick the right side in a fight, and he might wind up being the most positively impactful member of Trump's new team when people look back a generation from now. It'll be a huge uphill struggle as BigFood, BigAg, BigPharma, their de facto employees in "academia" and "medical" associations, as well as the political left are arrayed against him. But I'm still hopeful we see the beginning of populist movement bringing sanity and awareness into the mainstream. You'd think health, especially that of our children and grandchildren, would be something we all could agree on. But apparently that's not the case in 2024. Maybe 2025 will bring the start of something better.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT