Mary Anne has a patient who is a DEI Instructor at West Point, she/he/it doesn't have much time left.Sounds like a middle of the road source.
Mary Anne has a patient who is a DEI Instructor at West Point, she/he/it doesn't have much time left.Sounds like a middle of the road source.
Once again the work and organizational skills of Lara Trump !Shapiro came out last night against counting illegal ballots. What a schmuck. Even counting the votes the PA Supreme Court said couldn’t be counted, Casey loses. There aren’t enough of those votes. What an admirable leader. Not! BTW, when you have counts going on and people willfully violating state Supreme Court decisions just to try to get their candidate elected, what would the count have been, if the Republicans did not have a huge ground game with attorneys all over the US ready at a moment’s notice to take the local Dems/precincts to court?
Lara is the sharpest of the bunch. Eric punched above his weight when he hooked her.Once again the work and organizational skills of Lara Trump !
Technically, it would be election interference not fraud. In reality, it was just a bad poll that meant nothing. Almost everyone thought it was a bad poll when it came out so it didn't influence anything. I cannot think of anything that is more of a non story.I'm happy, stone for 15 days plus and counting.
It was a hail mary by the Democrats - but definitely election fraud since it was designed to manipulate the election. A hard concept for you to understand. Trump was always going to win Iowa big. All of you foolish Dems pushed that corrupt Iowa poll for days - Kamala is winning the swing states, Kamala is surging. I thought you, DeTrain, Icky, and Rill were against election interference. Guess not.
It wasn't just a bad poll that was wrong. Just stop, Jeff. You really are demeaning yourself with that statement.Technically, it would be election interference not fraud. In reality, it was just a bad poll that meant nothing. Almost everyone thought it was a bad poll when it came out so it didn't influence anything. I cannot think of anything that is more of a non story.
If I was an undecided near election day, I can't imagine my decision would be swayed by a Iowan poll. Boy, better vote for Harris, she is leading in Iowa!
Jeff, do you recall MSNBC, CNN, etc. saying it was a "bad poll" and it "meant nothing" when it came out?Technically, it would be election interference not fraud. In reality, it was just a bad poll that meant nothing. Almost everyone thought it was a bad poll when it came out so it didn't influence anything. I cannot think of anything that is more of a non story.
If I was an undecided near election day, I can't imagine my decision would be swayed by a Iowan poll. Boy, better vote for Harris, she is leading in Iowa!
It might be rather cynical of me, but I think that poll was primarily about getting donations rather than getting votes. I tend to agree that as far as the election itself, the poll was not really any different than a disingenuous campaign ad. I wish things were less slimy, but slimy works often enough it's part of the toolbox. It'll take voters, and likely more importantly, donors, to say no to slime to change anything. I was actually mildly heartened that voters seemed to reject some of the nonsense this go around.Technically, it would be election interference not fraud. In reality, it was just a bad poll that meant nothing. Almost everyone thought it was a bad poll when it came out so it didn't influence anything. I cannot think of anything that is more of a non story.
If I was an undecided near election day, I can't imagine my decision would be swayed by a Iowan poll. Boy, better vote for Harris, she is leading in Iowa!
There were a number of CNN staff that questioned the poll.Jeff, do you recall MSNBC, CNN, etc. saying it was a "bad poll" and it "meant nothing" when it came out?
It wasn't just a bad poll that was wrong. Just stop, Jeff.
Boy you are a die hard Democrat like your follower Dtrainixky.There were a number of CNN staff that questioned the poll.
What????I find the polls influential. Is Trump ahead or behind? Late summer he was behind, then ahead as time progressed, and then behind again- always seemed close. Toward the end most polls had him ahead, but within the "3%" margin of error.
This fake poll in Iowa basically said the margin of error was happening and Harris was going to win so get out and vote. Shock and Awe. The left wing media touted it widely that she was an old school numbers gal so you gotta trust her. Kamala had a billion to spend, how much did this cost?
There is no way data influenced her decision to post a fake poll. Sad end to her career.
How many articles have to be posted about all the polling for you to actually admit your stated position is bullhockey doodoo? I even posted one where the NY Times and and a couple of other aggregates stopped including Trafalgar, Rasmussen and Atlas Intel…3 of the most accurate polling firms and Atlas has been quite accurate going back to 2020. Why didn’t they include them? Because they showed Trump winning nationally. Psyops. Period.Technically, it would be election interference not fraud. In reality, it was just a bad poll that meant nothing. Almost everyone thought it was a bad poll when it came out so it didn't influence anything. I cannot think of anything that is more of a non story.
If I was an undecided near election day, I can't imagine my decision would be swayed by a Iowan poll. Boy, better vote for Harris, she is leading in Iowa!
Are you sure that isn’t dtrainfleck69? 🤣Boy you are a die hard Democrat like your follower Dtrainixky.
Anderson did attack in this clip - he attacked Trump for daring to question the fair and impartial Ann S.
You will never awaken Jeff.
Eric runs a multi-billion dollar business, so give him some credit.Lara is the sharpest of the bunch. Eric punched above his weight when he hooked her.
Most of the polls were slanted to give the APPEARANCE of a slim 3-4 point Carmella lead. RCP took those pols and used this slanted information to increase her AVERAGE !Jeff, do you recall MSNBC, CNN, etc. saying it was a "bad poll" and it "meant nothing" when it came out?
I have read up on this issue.May need to read this Rilla.
Eric is not charismatic in any way. Lara is not only bright, but quick on her feet. Very sharp and a huge improvement to the RNC.Eric runs a multi-billion dollar business, so give him some credit.
Eric has received 111 subpoenas over the past 8 years.
He has never even received a parking ticket !
Her only guide is making a buck for herself.Tulsi Gabbard: Bashar Assad is 'a brutal dictator'
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard on Thursday called Syrian leader Bashar Assad a "brutal dictator" as her previous comments about the leader face increased scrutiny following a breakout performance at Wednesday's Democratic presidential debate.amp.cnn.com
Be it or Icky or DTrain, consistent with their character they have to hide behind someone who is unafraid, right or wrong, to voice their opinion.Are you sure that isn’t dtrainfleck69? 🤣