You mean the "Russian Hoax" that the Mueller Report and the Senate Committee, and Marco Rubio signed off on that said that it certainly wasn't a hoax and did occur? Keep yourself well informed.
..and in other news
- Thread starter ILisBest
- Start date
I don't have a party, and the discussion I was having doesn't need a referee. Thanks for playing though.
No, Stone, he means this list. You've pretty much pushed every one of these and to your credit still maintain they are all legit! The psy-ops tend to work well on an unfortunately large percentage of the US population.
The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operation.
The IRA is the Russia-based Internet Research Agency that stands accused of having bought some Facebook ads and made Twitter posts aimed at influencing users’ opinions of both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
In fact, Mueller’s report echos what Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said in the summer of 2018 when he announced that the special prosecutor had indicted the Russians and Russian companies:
There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime. There is no allegation that the conspiracy altered the vote count or changed any election result.
Says the lemming who believes the J6 committee was legitimate…. 🤣
Very narrow language quoted regarding crime or changing votes. Quote the language about the Trump campaign being receptive to Russian help and encouraging/assisting it. That is the collusion that was found to exist, and which you folks continue to deny. How about Trump's campaign manager Manafort that fed polling data to Russia and was convicted and was pardoned?
Unconstitutional?? Continuing Resolution Includes Section For House Offices to Quash Third Party Subpoenas of "House Data" - Disregards Separation of Powers Doctrine | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo
The recent Continuing Resolution introduced by Speaker Mike Johnson raises serious constitutional questions, potentially undermining the separation of powers. Discover the implications of this controversial provision.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Total garbage
Huge raise for congressional salaries too. 40% raise. They should get docked 40% just for having the audacity to consider a bill such as this one.Unconstitutional?? Continuing Resolution Includes Section For House Offices to Quash Third Party Subpoenas of "House Data" - Disregards Separation of Powers Doctrine | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo
The recent Continuing Resolution introduced by Speaker Mike Johnson raises serious constitutional questions, potentially undermining the separation of powers. Discover the implications of this controversial provision.
Total garbage
‘Groom children’: Watch school activity that demands students be ‘gay or lesbian’
Generations back, gays and lesbians were shunned in American society. That changed when they demanded to be acknowledged and then tolerated. Then they demanded to The post ‘Groom children’: Watch school activity that demands students be ‘gay or lesbian’ appeared first on WND News Center.
thelibertyloft.com
Disgusting
Aaron Rodgers says his critics should declare their vaccine status so readers know if they've been 'captured' by propaganda | Blaze Media
Rodgers said many of his detractors are 'still upset' about falling for a propaganda campaign.
www.theblaze.com
😂
The Electoral system had nothing to do with slaves. They were going to do it anyway, because they weren’t interested in a few population centers running the elections. The reason they had to compromise on NON-VOTING slaves was to keep the South in the Union and the Northern states weren’t going to accept something that wasn’t fair to each of them either. No electoral college, no Union. The involvement with the slaves was strictly regarding the fair distribution of electoral votes amongst the states. That is a strawman you have created. Period. End of story.
Last edited:
The Establishment giving the People the shaft on their way out of power.
Looks like they think DOGE is going to have some teeth, though I'll believe it when I see it.
You are getting more off base and ridiculous on this topic Give up. You posted an article that explains clearly how slavery was the issue behind the EC, and you gaslight the board and said that it did not mention one word about slavery. 🤡
I think SCOTUS would find this portion of the Bill to be unconstitutional.
Speaking of narrow language. Trump joked for Russia to send him Hillary's emails at a rally. Literally the entire MSM was howling about his collusion over this. Some dumb people bought it.
I will phrase this one more time so perhaps your stoned head can grasp it. Slaves were not allowed to vote. Since they weren’t allowed to vote, there wouldn’t have been any reason to argue about them counting as 3/5ths for a population count of each state. The 1787 convention hemmed and hawwed over Congress choosing the President while others suggested that democratic elections by the people were better. The South would be outvoted as the North had a ton more white voters. Neither solution discussed satisfied enough states. This is how the electoral college came about. It was the only way the states would hold together as a nation. It was at that juncture that the compromise mattered. But the fact that large population centers of whites up north outpaced the Southern population was the driver. Slaves were only brought in the count for the formula for number of electors. They were not the reason for the electoral college itself.
That better not pass….. I mean, that bill would be catastrophic and undermine a lot of what we’re trying to correct here!
Similar threads
