flight 33 said:

I thought you told me they have no intention of expanding just a month ago and it was just a radical right winger. Now we are moving the goalposts? Let’s see
1. CIA causes chaos in Syria by supporting the very terrorists we supposedly despise.
2. Assad gets overthrown.
3. Israel conveniently comes in to grab the land.
4. Thousands of Christian’s about to be displaced and slaughtered but who cares.

I have never said Oct 7 was a false flag and don’t ever think they would do that to their own people. However , they have conducted false flags in the past(Lavon affair, USS liberty). Some people in the west will never criticize the Israelis and that much is obvious, even to the detriment of their fellow citizens.
Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

bung23 said:

Whichever way the political (and financial) winds blow….

Click to expand...

AzIllini said:

I actually watched a few WNBA games because of Caitlyn Clark. She is getting roasted for trying to suck up to the black players who dominate her league. If you followed her rookie season you saw her repeatedly cheap shotted by black players, with Angel Reese (black) gleefully clapping in approval.

OK, but on the other side, no player in the WNBA makes much money except thru endorsements. The few that do get endorsements are largely white. So she is sending a message in support of all players, but particularly black that the salaries are not fair. This is an issue with the ownership, not so much society and race.

The WNBA has its collective bargaining agreement coming up and salaries probably will go up some but if you don't get endorsements, you still aren't getting rich in the WNBA. It is totally different in the NBA.

I feel like social media is seeking clicks on this one. I just wish she hadn't used the white privilege thing because that is not at all what this is all about. But did she mean it that way or did the "journalist" at Time magazine take some liberties?

At this point I doubt she would call out Time if they did take liberties but she otherwise seems like a normal midwestern woman who is THE BASKETBALL STAR OF THE WNBA. Good luck to her unless she proves a hopeless liberal. JMHO

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

ILisBest said:

The WNBA has not been around as long as the NFL, NBA or MLB. For instance, how long before the players in the NFL made any real money? These guys were getting their brains beat in and working a part time job in the beginning. So, you want to give them some leeway.
But we live in a time when you have a good product it can be recognized quickly online and grow much more rapidly. The problem is the WNBA is just not a great product. CC came into the league and was able to put some new eyeballs on their product and they still lost like 40 million? Most people don't care and even less will care after her stupid comments.
This is good in my mind so I can stop having to scroll past any information about their failed league. 🍾

Click to expand...

Uncoach said:

Looks like the Zuck is serious about working with Trump. He just donated $1 mil for Trump's inaugural fund.

Click to expand...

AzIllini said:

I actually watched a few WNBA games because of Caitlyn Clark. She is getting roasted for trying to suck up to the black players who dominate her league. If you followed her rookie season you saw her repeatedly cheap shotted by black players, with Angel Reese (black) gleefully clapping in approval.

OK, but on the other side, no player in the WNBA makes much money except thru endorsements. The few that do get endorsements are largely white. So she is sending a message in support of all players, but particularly black that the salaries are not fair. This is an issue with the ownership, not so much society and race.

The WNBA has its collective bargaining agreement coming up and salaries probably will go up some but if you don't get endorsements, you still aren't getting rich in the WNBA. It is totally different in the NBA.

I feel like social media is seeking clicks on this one. I just wish she hadn't used the white privilege thing because that is not at all what this is all about. But did she mean it that way or did the "journalist" at Time magazine take some liberties?

At this point I doubt she would call out Time if they did take liberties but she otherwise seems like a normal midwestern woman who is THE BASKETBALL STAR OF THE WNBA. Good luck to her unless she proves a hopeless liberal. JMHO

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...