ADVERTISEMENT

Pavia v. NCAA

A court has just ruled that, since the NCAA has no jurisdiction over junior colleges, it cannot apply the years a junior college player against one’s eligibility. Pavia is the QB at Vandy that beat Bama. He played two years at a junior college and three at D-1 schools. The court just ruled that he can play next year at Vandy. Part of the basis for the ruling was NIL so he could earn money next year. It will be interesting now to see how this impacts recruiting in the future.

..and in other news

You are getting more off base and ridiculous on this topic Give up. You posted an article that explains clearly how slavery was the issue behind the EC, and you gaslight the board and said that it did not mention one word about slavery. 🤡
I will phrase this one more time so perhaps your stoned head can grasp it. Slaves were not allowed to vote. Since they weren’t allowed to vote, there wouldn’t have been any reason to argue about them counting as 3/5ths for a population count of each state. The 1787 convention hemmed and hawwed over Congress choosing the President while others suggested that democratic elections by the people were better. The South would be outvoted as the North had a ton more white voters. Neither solution discussed satisfied enough states. This is how the electoral college came about. It was the only way the states would hold together as a nation. It was at that juncture that the compromise mattered. But the fact that large population centers of whites up north outpaced the Southern population was the driver. Slaves were only brought in the count for the formula for number of electors. They were not the reason for the electoral college itself.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT