And where do the Chinese students go to school? Do you see the problem now?
I completely agree with this. Chinese nationals should be no where near research at universities.
And where do the Chinese students go to school? Do you see the problem now?
The US Government pays Elon Musk's company SpaceX to perform functions in a much more efficient manner than NASA. HIs private money and the efficiency of his company costs the taxpayers significantly less than NASA rockets and space trips. The US government is paying Elon for actual services. The US government is paying Harvard for something other than a complete product as well as failed products.How much does the USA pay to Elon's companies? He certainly doesn't need the money. Is that fair? Same answer as to Harvard. They are business transactions. USA is paying for services provided by the world's richest man. You guys are way off base on this issue.
Hi Jeff! I have no problem with research funded by the government at these places. However, you nailed it here, Harvard is a government contractor and as a result is subject to government controls - such as do NOT discriminate, do NOT promote the eradication of the Jewish race, etc.Harvard is a government contractor. Should successful contractors do work for free? Research grants are the lifeblood for any major research institution. Cutting research studies is tricky, sometimes you don't know the value of a study until you get the results.
Well, unlike all of the other Obama EV seed money which went to bankrupt companies, Elon paid back his Tesla loan early, with interest, and paid the penalty for early payment as a thank you to the US citizens who helped him get off the ground.How much does the USA pay to Elon's companies? He certainly doesn't need the money. Is that fair? Same answer as to Harvard. They are business transactions. USA is paying for services provided by the world's richest man. You guys are way off base on this issue.
You just made that up because you think it makes you argument a winner.The US Government pays Elon Musk's company SpaceX to perform functions in a much more efficient manner than NASA. HIs private money and the efficiency of his company costs the taxpayers significantly less than NASA rockets and space trips. The US government is paying Elon for actual services. The US government is paying Harvard for something other than a complete product as well as failed products.
I hope there is some screening by the research professors. If the study is to determine whether water before a meal leads to weight loss, who cares about Chinese. If it has to do with something related to defense or security, of course not.I completely agree with this. Chinese nationals should be no where near research at universities.
Harvard discriminating is another RW BS argument to sway the gullible. Like Illegal immigrants collecting SS, or 150 year olds receiving checks. Do you believe the multitude of Harvard grads that are Jewish believe the school discriminates, or the Jewish millionaires and billionaires that graduated from (attended) Harvard believe that is true?Hi Jeff! I have no problem with research funded by the government at these places. However, you nailed it here, Harvard is a government contractor and as a result is subject to government controls - such as do NOT discriminate, do NOT promote the eradication of the Jewish race, etc.
Harvard's 'ideals' do not align with non-discrimination practices and as such they are no longer fit to be a government contractor. So, apparently, per this discussion, you believe pediatric research should be conducted in an environment where discrimination is promoted? Worthwhile research can always find a new home where all people are treated equally - except illegals.
FROM CNN, HARVARD SETTLESHarvard discriminating is another RW BS argument to sway the gullible. Like Illegal immigrants collecting SS, or 150 year olds receiving checks. Do you believe the multitude of Harvard grads that are Jewish believe the school discriminates, or the Jewish millionaires and billionaires that graduated from (attended) Harvard believe that is true?
Hi Jeff! I have no problem with research funded by the government at these places. However, you nailed it here, Harvard is a government contractor and as a result is subject to government controls - such as do NOT discriminate, do NOT promote the eradication of the Jewish race, etc.
Harvard's 'ideals' do not align with non-discrimination practices and as such they are no longer fit to be a government contractor. So, apparently, per this discussion, you believe pediatric research should be conducted in an environment where discrimination is promoted? Worthwhile research can always find a new home where all people are treated equally - except illegals.
Feel free bucko… I still won’t put you on ignore.Should I respond with a bunch of insults and ask you four more times?
Did you just repost the title? Did you really read what the allegations were, whom made them, and what the steps agreed to were? Just the sort of silliness you guys object to.FROM CNN, HARVARD SETTLES
Harvard University has settled two lawsuits accusing the Ivy League school of failing to protect Jewish students from antisemitic bullying and harassment on campus.
I didn’t make anything up. The government pays SpaceX for services that NASA cannot do anywhere near the low price of SpaceX. That leaves more money in the budget for NASA to perform other NASA functions. This information is easily found on the internet.You just made that up because you think it makes you argument a winner.
Maybe just 3 times?Should I respond with a bunch of insults and ask you four more times?
# 1 reason for Trump's winning !Did you get that info from the Trump Admin.? They haven't stated one true fact in 3 months.
Harvard discriminating is another RW BS argument to sway the gullible. Like Illegal immigrants collecting SS, or 150 year olds receiving checks. Do you believe the multitude of Harvard grads that are Jewish believe the school discriminates, or the Jewish millionaires and billionaires that graduated from (attended) Harvard believe that is true?
The idiots who crafted the law were not thinking !Oof.
Since you’re laser focused on responding to all of my posts, you might want to actually read the post I was responding to. Then look up what strawman means.
TJ wants 3 terms. Do you?
Harvard, Columbia, Brown, Yale are ALL guilty of allowing Pro Palestine, anti Isreal demonstrations on campus AND IN the classrooms.There’s no question whatsoever that they do nothing to prevent discrimination and intimidation of Jewish students.
Why do people defend the indefensible? Both sides.
NASA has always relied upon private US corporations to operate large portions of the space program. Remember that the outside vendors and their corporate logos were seen at every launch? NASA oversaw the large picture. Same today only Elon has contracted to provide rockets for use. NASA still involved. You have no idea whether Elon's performance is good or at a fair rate, or that Harvard is over billing or failing. Just making it up to fit RW narrative.I didn’t make anything up. The government pays SpaceX for services that NASA cannot do anywhere near the low price of SpaceX. That leaves more money in the budget for NASA to perform other NASA functions. This information is easily found on the internet.
Past Grants were 60 - 40 $ % splits. Grant to 60 University/Hospital 40.Hospitals in Boston need $10 Billion?
Let's cut/reduce the % not going to the research.Medical Research - Harvard Health
www.health.harvard.edu
Molecule that drives rare childhood cancer discovered
www.hsci.harvard.edu
Let's stop pediatric cancer studies that will learn them.
Hope is about the worst possible strategy to safeguard US secrets and technology.I hope there is some screening by the research professors. If the study is to determine whether water before a meal leads to weight loss, who cares about Chinese. If it has to do with something related to defense or security, of course not.
Sorry Jeff, it is one and the same. Harvard is a government contractor, true. As a result, they are subject to a lot of government oversight including accounting practices, non-discrimination, and on and on. They undoubtedly have to run a security program up to the level of their FCL and need an FSO and ITPSO to do annual training.That is a completely different topic. You are correct that if a contractor is not willing to agree to the government's parameters they can lose the contract. I don't know much about the parameters so I will not comment on this.
Harvard never turned away from wealthy alumni and their children !The government got involved in research that should strictly be private sector. We paid for beagles of all things to be mistreated and murdered. For what? Flies? Mosquitoes? Not a damn thing. Government paying for research is what gave us Covid-19 and also gave us some individuals involved in research who initially claimed the correct thing, that this was manipulated in a lab. Fauci got on the horn to these very fine, upstanding citizen researchers and essentially bribed them with grants, which can also be used as threats. Shut your mouth or no more money, as an example. There is no such thing as a non-profit that has $53.2 billion in endowments and $4 billion in real estate assets. Harvard got fat off of the People’s money. Luddites. LOL. Look in the mirror.
Apparently enough to sue Harvard and be awarded monetary settlements ! ( CNN )Harvard discriminating is another RW BS argument to sway the gullible. Like Illegal immigrants collecting SS, or 150 year olds receiving checks. Do you believe the multitude of Harvard grads that are Jewish believe the school discriminates, or the Jewish millionaires and billionaires that graduated from (attended) Harvard believe that is true?
Hard to believe there is an antisemitic bent at Harvard now, as opposed to historically. A quick look shows that 10% of undergrads are Jewish, 52.5% of the graduate students, 25% of the faculty and the school's President is Jewish. My position is easy to defend.There’s no question whatsoever that they do nothing to prevent discrimination and intimidation of Jewish students.
Why do people defend the indefensible? Both sides.
Wrong.Apparently enough to sue Harvard and be awarded monetary settlements ! ( CNN )
If using private contractors is standard practice at NASA then why are you vilifying Musk?NASA has always relied upon private US corporations to operate large portions of the space program. Remember that the outside vendors and their corporate logos were seen at every launch? NASA oversaw the large picture. Same today only Elon has contracted to provide rockets for use. NASA still involved. You have no idea whether Elon's performance is good or at a fair rate, or that Harvard is over billing or failing. Just making it up to fit RW narrative.
The idiots who crafted the law were not thinking !
It's ambiguous at best !
You didn't follow the thread. The subject was vilifying Harvard for taking money from U. S. Hence, the comparison to Elon. It is a quid pro quo.If using private contractors is standard practice at NASA then why are you vilifying Musk?
How did I know that he would rebel ?Wrong.
Except in Civil Courts !Hard to believe there is an antisemitic bent at Harvard now, as opposed to historically. A quick look shows that 10% of undergrads are Jewish, 52.5% of the graduate students, 25% of the faculty and the school's President is Jewish. My position is easy to defend.
I read the article earlier.How did I know that he would rebel ?
Which is why I sourced the info from CNN !
I am sorry, what position are you defending again?Hard to believe there is an antisemitic bent at Harvard now, as opposed to historically. A quick look shows that 10% of undergrads are Jewish, 52.5% of the graduate students, 25% of the faculty and the school's President is Jewish. My position is easy to defend.
No. It isn’t ambiguous. It was in direct response to FDR’s reign of terms of which he died serving as President from March 1933 to April 1945. The maximum any one person can occupy the White House is 10 years. That 10 would require by succession of prior President past the 1/2 way point of the second term and then two 4 year terms. Trump doesn’t fall into that category.The idiots who crafted the law were not thinking !
It's ambiguous at best !
Hard to believe there is an antisemitic bent at Harvard now, as opposed to historically. A quick look shows that 10% of undergrads are Jewish, 52.5% of the graduate students, 25% of the faculty and the school's President is Jewish. My position is easy to defend.
Perhaps, but it also seems like a lib-producing factory and money laundering facilityHarvard is a government contractor
The largest Police force in the World is majority of minorities,That's like saying there can't be systemic racism in a police department because a certain % of of police force is made up of minorities. I don't think that is a position shared by many on the left.
It's pretty clear that a lot of universities allowed antisemitism to go unchecked in recent years. I have a hard time believing they would have allowed similar intimidation towards other minority groups.