ADVERTISEMENT

Current events

So in December of last year Kamala said this-

article said:
WASHINGTON — Vice President Kamala Harris said Tuesday that people have "rightly" compared former President Donald Trump's latest comments about immigrants "poisoning the blood" of America to Adolf Hitler.

"It is language that is meant to divide us. It is language that I think people have rightly found similar to the language of Hitler," Harris said in an interview with MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell that aired Tuesday night.
...
The vice president said the real character of a leader is “someone who has empathy, who has some level of concern and care for the suffering of other people and then does something to alleviate that suffering.”
Kamala is so caring she opened the border. She cares nothing of Laken Riley and others murdered thanks to her being a do nothing border czar.

 
  • Like
Reactions: ILisBest
I don’t know his politics and don’t care. I do know that he is an idiot for claiming that Harris campaigning with Cheney is a negative.
crying-wojak-vs-chad.3.meme-pfarm-thumbnail.png
 
SCOTUS doesn't care about the Constitution, doesn't care about the express language of a statute, they are so hyper-partisan all they care about is helping Trump and the Repubs. Sad to see that they have peed away all credibility from one of a formerly great US institution.
They would wear your opinion as a badge of honor, Stonedax
 
This author is upset that illegal voters, you know, people who don't have the constitutional right to vote in US elections, just got approval to be purged by the SCOTUS. Oh noes! They are helping the Republicans!


They would wear your opinion as a badge of honor, Stonedax
As usual you two are ignorant of the facts. Any state can take proper steps to delete any non-citizens that are registered. However, Federal law states that they cannot do so within 90 days of an election as that does not allow enough time for the voter and the state to work out whether they are citizens, and prevents oversight by Feds to make sure it is no a pretense by the state to get rid of voters.
So Virginia could have acted just not this close to election. SCOTUS completely refused to recognize the statute. Also Virginia didn't know if the 1,200 were not citizens. They sent out mailings telling the voters that they had to contact the state and demonstrate that they were citizens. Typical to the great purge in Florida that helped elect W. Only Florida purged something like 150,000 mostly for not voting recently.
 
As usual you two are ignorant of the facts. Any state can take proper steps to delete any non-citizens that are registered. However, Federal law states that they cannot do so within 90 days of an election as that does not allow enough time for the voter and the state to work out whether they are citizens, and prevents oversight by Feds to make sure it is no a pretense by the state to get rid of voters.
So Virginia could have acted just not this close to election. SCOTUS completely refused to recognize the statute. Also Virginia didn't know if the 1,200 were not citizens. They sent out mailings telling the voters that they had to contact the state and demonstrate that they were citizens. Typical to the great purge in Florida that helped elect W. Only Florida purged something like 150,000 mostly for not voting recently.

This almost entirely inaccurate.

At issue was whether removing ineligible voters represented “systematic” changes to voting rolls, which is not allowed within 90 days of a federal election. The court ruled that it does not. The system does not allow non citizens to vote. Removing them is not a systemic change, but an enforcement of the current law. The 90-day quiet period prohibitions apply only to eligible voters. Virginia is making individual eligibility decisions, not changing the system.

Virginia allows same-day registration. Anyone who thinks their registrations were wrongly cancelled could re-register at an in-person polling place by affirming their citizenship.

Every person removed from the rolls self-identified as a non-citizen. So, if they were eligible but removed, it's their own fault. There's a mechanism to correct that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Uncoach
As usual you two are ignorant of the facts. Any state can take proper steps to delete any non-citizens that are registered. However, Federal law states that they cannot do so within 90 days of an election as that does not allow enough time for the voter and the state to work out whether they are citizens, and prevents oversight by Feds to make sure it is no a pretense by the state to get rid of voters.
So Virginia could have acted just not this close to election. SCOTUS completely refused to recognize the statute. Also Virginia didn't know if the 1,200 were not citizens. They sent out mailings telling the voters that they had to contact the state and demonstrate that they were citizens. Typical to the great purge in Florida that helped elect W. Only Florida purged something like 150,000 mostly for not voting recently.
I thought those voters declared on their applications that they weren’t US citizens. What’s to investigate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncoach
I mean the campaign of this was already posted, but the marketing is spectacular.

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT