If they are having trouble responding to rescues, I’m not sure why they (govt) are not allowing private drones to fly over the impacted areas to try to find/rescue people?
He did belittle the choice. I would have preferred Tulsi. There is no doubt Vance is sharper than advertised.
JD Vance did well in the debate but was still a bad pick. His favorably ratings is -10 while Walz is a +4. Vance just said Trump won in 2020 (day after debate) which doesn't help in any way. Don't get me wrong Walz was a bad pick too. I believe that both presidential candidates did not want to pick anybody too good less they be overshadowed by a more competent politician.
Knowing a little about aviation, I can tell you the limit on drones is a good thing. I do believe drones are capped at something around a few hundred feet. Anything over 8 pounds can take out an airplane/aircraft. It all boils down to the inability to track the drones, that is, no transponders.
Tulsi is great, but if you put Tulsi on the ticket people like Rill would say there are 2 Democrats on the ticket! And he would be half right since I believe Tulsi is just a reasonable American who is a Democrat on a large number of issues.
Vance was a great pick. At the time, I didn’t know too much about him. But, he flipped that -10 to a +10 for anyone watching the debate. The debate WAS the single opportunity for the country to meet Coach Walz and Vance.
After watching the VP debate, it is very clear that is nothing more than the power of the MSM. One is a goofball and the other one was completely in control with a terrific grip on the issues.
Let's see where his net favorabllity ratings are a week from now. You may be right.
