..and in other news
- Thread starter ILisBest
- Start date
It’s about time. I don’t understand why other states AG’s don’t sue California over this.
Fascinating. And “duh”.
www.city-journal.org
Debunking the Debunkers
Despite claiming years ago to have “the best words,” President-elect Donald Trump is something less than a flawless orator. Consider his remarks during an on-stage appearance this past summer at the annual convention of the National Association of Black Journalists: “I will tell you that coming...
www.city-journal.org
“coming to a city and state near you soon.”
Self inflicted damage that we can’t quantify. Crime, housing costs, etc. They hated Trump so much they put in the worst policy imaginable.
I feel sorry for him. Neither his daughters nor he should discuss politics so strongly that they lose their love (hopefully temporarily) for each other.
I think we hear about the "outliers" when it comes to political discord among family and friends. We have a true mix of conservatives and liberals on our cul-de-sac street and it doesn't seem to have any influence on how we enjoy each other.
Maybe that will change when you put your 12 foot Trump #47 in a santa suit decoration out for Christmas.
What Davis Plouffe is saying is that Kamala needed to win the late vote in order to win the election as she was never ahead.
In other words, Stone, Jeff, and Rill - she needed margins like Trump’s miraculous +16 in Iowa based on that totally legit poll 4 days before the election.
That massive weekend surge for Trump is what Kammy needed. Right Icky69?
In other words, Stone, Jeff, and Rill - she needed margins like Trump’s miraculous +16 in Iowa based on that totally legit poll 4 days before the election.
That massive weekend surge for Trump is what Kammy needed. Right Icky69?
It was all psyops. Everything I was reading was the campaign/Democrats were depressed because their internal polling numbers were terrible. All they could do was the "late" vote. as in the 3 am ballot dumps that happened in 2020 and occurred in the Wisconsin Senate race this year...add in the Pennsylvania nonsense this year where they even publicly stated they were counting ballots against the PA State Supreme Court and you know they did the same thing in 2020. It's baked into their brains to cheat. They can't win on policy. Their policies are bad. You can't campaign on Trump being a threat to democracy when the Democrats are counting illegal ballots.
Here is where Rill, Train, ICky, etc got it so disastrously wrong. Trump attracted a winning tally, not the old type of “normie” R.
Trump WAS the winning choice. The question is do they now understand it? Rill - feel free to chime in - interested to hear your view
Trump WAS the winning choice. The question is do they now understand it? Rill - feel free to chime in - interested to hear your view
I believe the one in Wisconsin is questionable. You just have to look at the ballot dump that was around 4 am, IIRC. Straight line upward for the Dem.
TJ, that is an important link I hope the Republicans take notice of. Trump won the top spot but down the ticket the Dems maneuvered to hold/pick up seats.
The 2024 election law changes in Dem supermajority California are so loose they can basically elect anyone the party bosses want. I just spent 10 minutes trying to find how many House seats the Calif Dems gained in 2024, but I'm not finding that. What is apparent is there are 2 uncalled races in Calif that are getting closer every day.
Edit. The AP just called one of the CA districts for the Dem (about 4PM EST), a flip from a Republican. Apparently there was some gerrymandering involved as it is not the same district as before but a pickup for the Dems. Republicans are at 220 with only 1 race nationwide to decide; vote counting still in progress in CA. 218 is the majority
The 2024 election law changes in Dem supermajority California are so loose they can basically elect anyone the party bosses want. I just spent 10 minutes trying to find how many House seats the Calif Dems gained in 2024, but I'm not finding that. What is apparent is there are 2 uncalled races in Calif that are getting closer every day.
Edit. The AP just called one of the CA districts for the Dem (about 4PM EST), a flip from a Republican. Apparently there was some gerrymandering involved as it is not the same district as before but a pickup for the Dems. Republicans are at 220 with only 1 race nationwide to decide; vote counting still in progress in CA. 218 is the majority
Last edited:
I think it’s clear the DEI industry is in total collapse. It unsurprisingly offered nothing to the private sector beyond an unnecessary expense. While I doubt it did much damage within businesses in real terms (beyond being a waste of resources), if anything it created more resentment between groups than less.
This is yet another example of how progressive ideas being put into action is the best way to defeat them. They are largely stupid and bound for failure. DEI is just a rare one that was actually put into action.
Leadership and someone who actually cares for the American people - not personally, but in general
It’s amazing what happens when you threaten tariffs that a few posters here hate. Negotiate from a position of strength. This is something most of the DC crowd simply don’t understand.
Mexico and Canada deserved the threat of tariffs - a threat which they knew was real. They have been acting against the interests of the USA for 4 years. Tariffs to the US would crush them so they will now be acting in the interest of the USA,
Canada and Mexico had been acting in the interests of the Deep State and, @JeffT818’s Democrat party. They now bow to Trump. Negotiating from a position of strength normally isn’t impressive. However, after the last 4 years……it is refreshing
I think it would be great if true. I had a heated exchange with a family member before I started my treatment. Conventional treatments have some pretty long track records that are hard to ignore when making treatment decisions. I find it hard to believe that so many doctors would ignore any type of inexpensive, effective treatment for cancer patients. It is not impossible, but I find it unlikely.
Yet some Voted against THE President that is willing to STOP illegal immigration !
Mexico and Canada deserved the threat of tariffs - a threat which they knew was real. They have been acting against the interests of the USA for 4 years. Tariffs to the US would crush them so they will now be acting in the interest of the USA,
Canada and Mexico had been acting in the interests of the Deep State and, @JeffT818’s Democrat party. They now bow to Trump. Negotiating from a position of strength normally isn’t impressive. However, after the last 4 years……it is refreshing
[/QUOTE]
Mexico's President has promised to STOP migrant caravans after a nice phone call WITH TRUMP !
Canada and Mexico had been acting in the interests of the Deep State and, @JeffT818’s Democrat party. They now bow to Trump. Negotiating from a position of strength normally isn’t impressive. However, after the last 4 years……it is refreshing
[/QUOTE]
Mexico's President has promised to STOP migrant caravans after a nice phone call WITH TRUMP !
You can buy that where ?Maybe that will change when you put your 12 foot Trump #47 in a santa suit decoration out for Christmas.
I can't speak at all to that drug as a potential cancer treatment, but the topic speaks to how and why the so-called MAHA initiative has value. The way the system has evolved it takes a pharmaceutical company to essentially pay the cost of getting a drug through the approvals and essentially market it to medical providers, which none of them will do for a drug with an expired patent. Also, iirc it typically takes at least 17 years before research findings make their way into clinical practice. As an aside, I don't think we want to be in a headlong rush to throw every novel treatment out there ASAP either. Someday the pandemic "vaccine" saga will be the archetype case study for why some sobriety/speed bumps are desirable/necessary when it comes to deploying new treatments, assuming at some point we reach a consensus that human life and health transcend political power struggles. One positive thing the federal health agencies (and the various medical associations) could do is break up their the cozy relationships with Big Pharma (and Big Food) and be the conduit for findings that no commercial entity would be incentivized to pursue.
Another thing to consider is that best practice would often be a both/and situation rather than an either/or. As an example, so-called metabolic therapies are being developed for glioblastoma. It's a type of cancer for which there is currently no truly effective conventional protocol to treat, so there is no conflict with best practices and established treatments. It's primarily a modification a patient's diet/nutrition to stress cancer cells and has potential as part of a holistic protocol to boost the efficacy of any conventional treatment for most cancers. But there's nothing to "sell" so there's no path in the current system for it to get due consideration as an widespread oncology option.
I don't know if you're referring to past treatment or something that's ongoing or pending, but best wishes for your continued health going forward.
What a disaster she would have been. This is what happens when you’ve never been responsible for money. You run out of it.
I'm sure they are on Amazon with free shipping. Also look for the 12 foot #48 J D Vance elf. It turns from an elf to a santa in 4 years.
The Trump santa actually wiggles a little bit, so you can play YMCA over a loudspeaker for cul de sac dance parties.
Of course you may want to be magnanimous and try to appease liberal neighbors. On severe discount is a 5 foot Kamala Harris decoration, dressed in Hawaai vacation clothes. It doesn't do anything but you can probably hide it behind a reindeer.
Happy Thanksgiving to all. At midnight it is Christmas season except at our local Costco, which had Christmas stuff out in September.
Girls doing the right thing, even though it ends their season. Men who belong to the Dem party need to stand up. This is wrong. We all know biological males have advantages over biological females, we have known that since junior high dodgeball. Stop the insanity, progressives.
That's where research at places like the University of Illinois comes in. Since there's no drug involved that needs massive testing for approval, academic institutions are in a great position to carry this out.
Separately, COVID-19 launched the world into a no-win situation. Thousands of Americans were dying by the day so the sense of urgency to come up with a vaccine and/or cure was at the highest conceivable level. Now the government and corporate mandates that emerged from this... that's a different matter.
I just finished and thanks. Before they could start my treatment, I had to complete a battery of hurdles. So, I did do some minor research on Ivermectin and decided it couldn't hurt me. So, I used it for 2.5 weeks before treatment. I watched my lymph nodes grow over that time. A lot of people that are fans of it, encourage it in conjunction with traditional treatments. If you are stage 4 all bets are off and do what you want. Fenbendazole was also one to look at here.
Hopefully, someday soon we can have more transparency here and a clearer picture.
Add this to the long list of bad people the left tried to sell as heroes to the public.
Actually one of the central figures behind it, Dr Thomas Seyfried, is an Illinois alum. Certainly UIUC could do certain research, but the missing gap is how to get it to oncologists and the dietary consultants that work with them. The clinical trials and such need funding, and most research institutions are heavily funded by competing interests. No Idea if that applies to Illinois specifically.
Similar threads
