Assuming no more additions to the roster, this is what I have.
Point guard: Abrams (30) Tate (10)
Wings: Hill (30), Nunn (30), Coleman-Lands (20)
Bigs: Thorne (25), Black (20), Paul (20), Finke (15)
* Hope to add another PG so Tracy doesn't have to play those kind of minutes.
* It would help if Black or Finke could play some "3", or if DJ Williams is ready
* Mav Morgan has his work cut out for him
* With Ennis, this is a Sweet 16 team. With LoVett it's not quite as good, but better in 2016
* Currently, it's a roster that is 5-7 games better than last season, and an NCAA team
* The biggest difference is the post presence offensively.
* Nnanna is gone, but they have enough size to defend the rim without him.
* Ball pressure will be better with Abrams, but they will miss Rice's perimeter defense a ton.
* They will have to make a decision on red-shirting or playing DJ Williams and / or Aaron Jordan.
* If Finke and / or Coleman-Lands make a jump in minutes, that's a good thing - means this team is more talented.
* I don't think Coleman-Lands handles it well enough to play the "1". Not against high major defenders.
Your thoughts?
Point guard: Abrams (30) Tate (10)
Wings: Hill (30), Nunn (30), Coleman-Lands (20)
Bigs: Thorne (25), Black (20), Paul (20), Finke (15)
* Hope to add another PG so Tracy doesn't have to play those kind of minutes.
* It would help if Black or Finke could play some "3", or if DJ Williams is ready
* Mav Morgan has his work cut out for him
* With Ennis, this is a Sweet 16 team. With LoVett it's not quite as good, but better in 2016
* Currently, it's a roster that is 5-7 games better than last season, and an NCAA team
* The biggest difference is the post presence offensively.
* Nnanna is gone, but they have enough size to defend the rim without him.
* Ball pressure will be better with Abrams, but they will miss Rice's perimeter defense a ton.
* They will have to make a decision on red-shirting or playing DJ Williams and / or Aaron Jordan.
* If Finke and / or Coleman-Lands make a jump in minutes, that's a good thing - means this team is more talented.
* I don't think Coleman-Lands handles it well enough to play the "1". Not against high major defenders.
Your thoughts?
