I happened to read an article by Robert (aka ALionEye) that wondered whether Mike Phair's departure has had a bigger impact than people thought initially. An interesting take, actually.
As bad as our defense was last year, it wasn't this bad. And we actually stopped a jet sweep or two every once in a while. Wasn't Phair the de facto DC on running plays?
Is Robert onto something?
As bad as our defense was last year, it wasn't this bad. And we actually stopped a jet sweep or two every once in a while. Wasn't Phair the de facto DC on running plays?
Is Robert onto something?